Minimum Viable Product Development For A Real Quick Product Launch

Minimum Viable Product Development

Less Time-to-Market

Let us reintroduce MVPs as solutions for quickly launching your concept in the market. Our solution gets you the actual user feedback, allowing us to gradually upgrade the product.

Beta Testing

With MVP development we perform advanced functionality (UI/UX) testing among beta users. This allows us to prepare the most user-centric application.

Analyzing The Market Need

Close to 42% of concepts fail because of no demand in the market. With MVP development we can avoid that risk of failure by obtaining the early mood-of-market on your concept.

Minimum Costs

Minimum viable product development lets us incorporate a small yet highly efficient team for your concept development, this diminishes the need for a large development team.

Product Pitching

MVP development provides us the opportunity to present you with a working model of your idea, thus, gaining investors’/stakeholders’ confidence in your product.

Get Started

Related Information

Frequently Asked Questions

A minimum viable product ( MVP) is a product with bare minimum features to entice early-adopter clients and verify a new concept early in the product development cycle. In industries such as software, the MVP can assist the product development team in receiving customer input as rapidly as possible so that the product can be iterated and improved.

The MVP is crucial for agile development since the process surrounds verifying and refining products based on user feedback.

It’s the method of a product idea that allows a product development team to get the details of verified customer experience with the least amount of resources and efforts.

An organization’s product team may decide to produce and distribute a minimum viable product in order to:

  • Release a product as quickly as possible
  • Test a concept with customers, and before investing a substantial amount of money on the full-featured product.
  • Discover what appeals to the organization’s target market and what does not.

No. The term MVP or “minimum viable product” does not reflect the same meaning as “minimum product.” For your clients or customers, a minimum product is your offering at its most basic and entry level stage. It just does one thing: provides a particular solution. When you launch a minimum product, you will never get into the product-market analysis stage.

For instance, consider the microblogging site of Twitter. They initially introduced a minimum viable product with a capacity to publish posts of no more than 160 characters. After the user feedback and market response, they gradually added features.

If you’re curious about how this would turn-out in reality. Let’s see how some of the well-known firms developed successful MVPs.

Airbnb

Started from an apartment, the Airbnb’s founders with little or no money to invest, used their own apartment to test their idea of online peer-to-peer rental housing and to form a short-term marketplace. They developed a simple website, uploaded a couple of images and some relevant information about their place, and within a few days, they had many paying guests.

Foursquare

Foursquare, a location-based social platform, began as a one-feature MVP, with simple check-ins and engagement rewards. The Foursquare development team didn’t start adding suggestions, city guides, and other features until they had validated the idea with an enthusiastic and expanding user base. Other examples of companies that incorporated MVP model are Dropbox, Virgin Air, Spool, Groupon, and more.

When you take on a project, it becomes obvious that when an increased number of tasks, people, and other dynamic components of product development are involved, the more complex and difficult it gets to manage.

Furthermore, while developing a new product, the more complicated the parts are built, the longer it will take to complete the entire project. Therefore, when the number of difficult elements is reduced, the development process becomes much easier. Here, particularly because of the less functionality and features, it reduces the amount of coding required. Hence, the room for error in the development cycle gets minimalistic.